![]() ![]() “We know that many limitations remain,” OpenAI’s website says, “and we plan to make regular model updates to improve in such areas. Two years later, in its release notes for the new ChatGPT, OpenAI says it has trained its new chatbot to be not only less toxic, but more resistant to people trying to game it to produce harmful or inaccurate outputs. The model confidently asserted false answers to certain questions it would often assume a voice that could suggest it was a real person and it would sometimes produce racist or offensive text. ![]() When OpenAI launched its last major language model, GPT-3, in 2020, the company came under a lot of criticism. The full and unedited conversation is reproduced below. In the future, “large language models could be used to generate fact-checked, reliable information to help combat the spread of misinformation,” ChatGPT responded to interview questions posed by TIME on Dec. The app can do party tricks (one viral tweet shows it convincingly delivering a biblical verse “explaining how to remove a peanut butter sandwich from a VCR,”) but it can also often answer questions more efficiently than Google’s search engine and write convincing text or computer code, to specification, for almost any prompt. The program, called ChatGPT, is more advanced than any other chatbot available for public interaction, and many observers say it represents a step change in the industry. 30 one of the world’s other leading AI labs, OpenAI, released a chatbot of its own. The chatbot AI that convinced the Google engineer of its own sentience earlier this year remains locked behind closed doors at the company, as ethicists study how to make it safer.īut on Nov. To release such a program would surely be deeply unethical. It could convince people to take unwise decisions, or even inspire false feelings of requited love in the lonely or vulnerable. Such a machine could lead people to believe false information. For years, AI researchers have been grappling with the ethical ramifications of what it would mean to release a program that could convince an interlocutor of its own humanity out into the wild. This summer, Google fired one of its engineers who had become convinced that one of its chatbots had reached sentience. But they can easily pass the Turing test. Seven decades later, in 2022, even the most cutting edge artificial intelligence (AI) systems cannot think in any way comparable to a human brain. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |